@conference {14830,
	title = {Localizing parts of faces using a consensus of exemplars},
	booktitle = {Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011/06//},
	pages = {545 - 552},
	abstract = {We present a novel approach to localizing parts in images of human faces. The approach combines the output of local detectors with a non-parametric set of global models for the part locations based on over one thousand hand-labeled exemplar images. By assuming that the global models generate the part locations as hidden variables, we derive a Bayesian objective function. This function is optimized using a consensus of models for these hidden variables. The resulting localizer handles a much wider range of expression, pose, lighting and occlusion than prior ones. We show excellent performance on a new dataset gathered from the internet and show that our localizer achieves state-of-the-art performance on the less challenging BioID dataset.},
	keywords = {Bayesian, faces;lighting;occlusion;pose;Bayes, function;exemplar, images;expression;face, localization;human, methods;face, objective, part, recognition;},
	doi = {10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995602},
	author = {Belhumeur,P. N. and Jacobs, David W. and Kriegman, D.J. and Kumar,N.}
}
@conference {14024,
	title = {Approximate expressions for the mean and the covariance of the maximum likelihood estimator for acoustic source localization},
	booktitle = {Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP {\textquoteright}05). IEEE International Conference on},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005/03//},
	pages = {iii/73 - iii/76 Vol. 3 - iii/73 - iii/76 Vol. 3},
	abstract = {Acoustic source localization using multiple microphones can be formulated as a maximum likelihood estimation problem. The estimator is implicitly defined as the minimum of a certain objective function. As a result, we cannot get explicit expressions for the mean and the covariance of the estimator. We derive approximate expressions for the mean vector and covariance matrix of the estimator using Taylor{\textquoteright}s series expansion of the implicitly defined estimator. The validity of our expressions is verified by Monte-Carlo simulations. We also study the performance of the estimator for different microphone array configurations.},
	keywords = {(mathematics);, acoustic, approximate, approximation, array, array;, covariance, estimation;, expansion;, expressions;, function;, likelihood, localization;, matrices;, matrix;, maximum, mean, microphone, objective, processing;, series, signal, source, Taylor, theory;, vector;, vectors;},
	doi = {10.1109/ICASSP.2005.1415649},
	author = {Raykar,V.C. and Duraiswami, Ramani}
}
@conference {13212,
	title = {A fine-structure image/video quality measure using local statistics},
	booktitle = {Image Processing, 2004. ICIP {\textquoteright}04. 2004 International Conference on},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004/10//},
	pages = {3535 - 3538 Vol. 5 - 3535 - 3538 Vol. 5},
	abstract = {An objective no-reference measure is presented to assess line-structure image/video quality. It was designed to measure image/video quality for video surveillance applications, especially for background modeling and foreground object detection. The proposed measure using local statistics reflects image degradation well in terms of noise and blur. The experimental results on a background subtraction algorithm validate the usefulness of the proposed measure, by showing its correlation with the algorithm{\textquoteright}s performance.},
	keywords = {algorithm;, background, degradation;, detection;, foreground, image, line-structure, local, measure;, modeling;, no-reference, object, objective, processing;, QUALITY, signal, statistics;, subtraction, surveillance;, video},
	doi = {10.1109/ICIP.2004.1421879},
	author = {Kim,Kyungnam and Davis, Larry S.}
}
@article {17798,
	title = {Optimal models of disjunctive logic programs: semantics, complexity, and computation},
	journal = {Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004/04//},
	pages = {487 - 503},
	abstract = {Almost all semantics for logic programs with negation identify a set, SEM(P), of models of program P, as the intended semantics of P, and any model M in this class is considered a possible meaning of P with regard to the semantics the user has in mind. Thus, for example, in the case of stable models [M. Gelfond et al., (1988)], choice models [D. Sacca et al., (1990)], answer sets [M. Gelfond et al., (1991)], etc., different possible models correspond to different ways of "completing" the incomplete information in the logic program. However, different end-users may have different ideas on which of these different models in SEM(P) is a reasonable one from their point of view. For instance, given SEM(P), user U<sub>1</sub> may prefer model M<sub>1</sub> isin;SEM(P) to model M<sub>2</sub> isin;SEM(P) based on some evaluation criterion that she has. We develop a logic program semantics based on optimal models. This semantics does not add yet another semantics to the logic programming arena - it takes as input an existing semantics SEM(P) and a user-specified objective function Obj, and yields a new semantics Opt(P)_ sube; SEM(P) that realizes the objective function within the framework of preferred models identified already by SEM(P). Thus, the user who may or may not know anything about logic programming has considerable flexibility in making the system reflect her own objectives by building "on top" of existing semantics known to the system. In addition to the declarative semantics, we provide a complete complexity analysis and algorithms to compute optimal models under varied conditions when SEM(P) is the stable model semantics, the minimal models semantics, and the all-models semantics.},
	keywords = {complexity;, computational, disjunctive, function;, knowledge, LANGUAGE, Logic, minimal, model, nonmonotonic, objective, optimisation;, OPTIMIZATION, problems;, program, Programming, programming;, reasoning;, representation;, semantics;, stable, user-specified},
	isbn = {1041-4347},
	doi = {10.1109/TKDE.2004.1269672},
	author = {Leone,N. and Scarcello,F. and V.S. Subrahmanian}
}
@conference {13248,
	title = {Probabilistic tracking in joint feature-spatial spaces},
	booktitle = {Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003/06//},
	pages = {I-781 - I-788 vol.1 - I-781 - I-788 vol.1},
	abstract = {In this paper, we present a probabilistic framework for tracking regions based on their appearance. We exploit the feature-spatial distribution of a region representing an object as a probabilistic constraint to track that region over time. The tracking is achieved by maximizing a similarity-based objective function over transformation space given a nonparametric representation of the joint feature-spatial distribution. Such a representation imposes a probabilistic constraint on the region feature distribution coupled with the region structure, which yields an appearance tracker that is robust to small local deformations and partial occlusion. We present the approach for the general form of joint feature-spatial distributions and apply it to tracking with different types of image features including row intensity, color and image gradient.},
	keywords = {analysis;, appearance, appearance;, color;, colour, Computer, constraint;, deformation;, detection;, distribution;, edge, estimation;, extraction;, feature, feature-spatial, feature;, function, gradient;, image, intensity;, joint, likelihood, local, maximization;, maximum, nonparametric, object, objective, occlusion;, optical, partial, probabilistic, probability;, region, representation;, row, similarity-based, small, space;, structure;, target, tracker;, tracking;, transformation, vision;},
	doi = {10.1109/CVPR.2003.1211432},
	author = {Elgammal,A. and Duraiswami, Ramani and Davis, Larry S.}
}
