TY - JOUR T1 - SParseval: Evaluation metrics for parsing speech JF - Proc. LREC Y1 - 2006 A1 - Roark,B. A1 - Harper,M. A1 - Charniak,E. A1 - Dorr, Bonnie J A1 - Johnson,M. A1 - Kahn,J. A1 - Liu,Y. A1 - Ostendorf,M. A1 - Hale,J. A1 - Krasnyanskaya,A. A1 - others AB - While both spoken and written language processing stand to benefit from parsing, the standard Parseval metrics (Black et al., 1991) andtheir canonical implementation (Sekine and Collins, 1997) are only useful for text. The Parseval metrics are undefined when the words input to the parser do not match the words in the gold standard parse tree exactly, and word errors are unavoidable with automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. To fill this gap, we have developed a publicly available tool for scoring parses that implements a variety of metrics which can handle mismatches in words and segmentations, including: alignment-based bracket evaluation, alignment-based dependency evaluation, and a dependency evaluation that does not require alignment. We describe the different metrics, how to use the tool, and the outcome of an extensive set of experiments on the sensitivity of the metrics. ER -