@conference {15684,
	title = {Dynamic load balancing across mirrored multimedia servers},
	booktitle = {2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2003. ICME {\textquoteright}03. Proceedings},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003/07/06/9},
	pages = {II- 53-6 vol.2 - II- 53-6 vol.2},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to present protocols for efficient load balancing across replicated multimedia servers in a metropolitan area network. Current multimedia infrastructures, even when they use mirrored servers, do not have standardized load balancing schemes. Existing schemes frequently require participation from the clients in balancing the load across the servers efficiently. We propose two protocols in this paper for fair load balancing without any client-side processing being required. Neither protocol requires any change to the network-level infrastructure. Using network packet loss and packet transmission delay as the chief metrics, we show the effectiveness of the protocols through extensive simulations.},
	keywords = {client-server systems, Delay, Internet, load balancing protocols, Load management, media streaming, metropolitan area network, metropolitan area networks, mirrored multimedia servers, Multimedia communication, multimedia servers, network packet loss, Network servers, packet transmission delay, Propagation losses, Protocols, Streaming media, Topology, Traffic control, Web server},
	isbn = {0-7803-7965-9},
	doi = {10.1109/ICME.2003.1221551},
	author = {Matthur,A. and Mundur, Padma}
}
@conference {15687,
	title = {Network service selection for distributed multimedia applications},
	booktitle = {Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications, 1999. ICCIMA {\textquoteright}99. Proceedings},
	year = {1999},
	month = {1999///},
	pages = {388 - 392},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	abstract = {An important question in the development of system support for distributed multimedia is the type of network service offered to applications. This paper compares two network service disciplines: weighted fair queueing (WFQ) and non-preemptive earliest deadline first (NEDF). We show that, for a broad class of high-bandwidth distributed multimedia applications, WFQ outperforms NEDF in terms of network throughput while still providing an application-adequate end-to-end service. This result holds despite the fact that NEDF offers applications far greater flexibility in terms of control over end-to-end delivery delay},
	keywords = {Admission control, Application software, application-adequate end-to-end service, Bandwidth, Communication system traffic control, Computer science, Delay, distributed processing, end-to-end delivery delay control, flexibility, high-bandwidth distributed multimedia applications, interactive multimedia, multimedia systems, network service selection, network throughput, nonpreemptive earliest deadline first, queueing theory, Regulators, system support, telecommunication services, Throughput, Traffic control, weighted fair queueing},
	isbn = {0-7695-0300-4},
	doi = {10.1109/ICCIMA.1999.798561},
	author = {Simon,R. and Sood,A. and Mundur, Padma}
}
