@article {17397,
	title = {Temporal Summaries: Supporting Temporal Categorical Searching, Aggregation and Comparison},
	journal = {IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics},
	volume = {15},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009/12//Nov},
	pages = {1049 - 1056},
	abstract = {When analyzing thousands of event histories, analysts often want to see the events as an aggregate to detect insights and generate new hypotheses about the data. An analysis tool must emphasize both the prevalence and the temporal ordering of these events. Additionally, the analysis tool must also support flexible comparisons to allow analysts to gather visual evidence. In a previous work, we introduced align, rank, and filter (ARF) to accentuate temporal ordering. In this paper, we present temporal summaries, an interactive visualization technique that highlights the prevalence of event occurrences. Temporal summaries dynamically aggregate events in multiple granularities (year, month, week, day, hour, etc.) for the purpose of spotting trends over time and comparing several groups of records. They provide affordances for analysts to perform temporal range filters. We demonstrate the applicability of this approach in two extensive case studies with analysts who applied temporal summaries to search, filter, and look for patterns in electronic health records and academic records.},
	keywords = {Aggregates, Collaborative work, Computational Biology, Computer Graphics, Data analysis, data visualisation, Data visualization, Databases, Factual, Displays, Event detection, Filters, Heparin, History, Human computer interaction, Human-computer interaction, HUMANS, Information Visualization, Interaction design, interactive visualization technique, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Performance analysis, Springs, temporal categorical data visualization, temporal categorical searching, temporal ordering, temporal summaries, Thrombocytopenia, Time factors},
	isbn = {1077-2626},
	doi = {10.1109/TVCG.2009.187},
	author = {Wang,T. D and Plaisant, Catherine and Shneiderman, Ben and Spring, Neil and Roseman,D. and Marchand,G. and Mukherjee,V. and Smith,M.}
}
@conference {14696,
	title = {Fable: A Language for Enforcing User-defined Security Policies},
	booktitle = {IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2008. SP 2008},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008/05/18/22},
	pages = {369 - 383},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	abstract = {This paper presents FABLE, a core formalism for a programming language in which programmers may specify security policies and reason that these policies are properly enforced. In FABLE, security policies can be expressed by associating security labels with the data or actions they protect. Programmers define the semantics of labels in a separate part of the program called the enforcement policy. FABLE prevents a policy from being circumvented by allowing labeled terms to be manipulated only within the enforcement policy; application code must treat labeled values abstractly. Together, these features facilitate straightforward proofs that programs implementing a particular policy achieve their high-level security goals. FABLE is flexible enough to implement a wide variety of security policies, including access control, information flow, provenance, and security automata. We have implemented FABLE as part of the LINKS web programming language; we call the resulting language SELlNKS. We report on our experience using SELlNKS to build two substantial applications, a wiki and an on-line store, equipped with a combination of access control and provenance policies. To our knowledge, no existing framework enables the enforcement of such a wide variety of security policies with an equally high level of assurance.},
	keywords = {Access control, Automata, Collaborative work, Communication system security, Computer languages, computer security, Data security, enforcement policy, FABLE, Government, high-level security goals, information flow, Information security, Language-based security, programming languages, Programming profession, provenance, security automata, security labels, security of data, user-defined security policies, verified enforcement, Web programming language},
	isbn = {978-0-7695-3168-7},
	doi = {10.1109/SP.2008.29},
	author = {Swamy,N. and Corcoran,B.J. and Hicks, Michael W.}
}
@article {17209,
	title = {Human-centered computing, online communities, and virtual environments},
	journal = {IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications},
	volume = {19},
	year = {1999},
	month = {1999/12//Nov},
	pages = {70 - 74},
	abstract = {This report summarizes results of the first EC/NSF joint Advanced Research Workshop, which identified key research challenges and opportunities in information technology. The group agreed that the first joint research workshop should concentrate on the themes of human-centered computing and VEs. Human-centered computing is perceived as an area of strategic importance because of the move towards greater decentralization and decomposition in the location and provision of computation. The area of VEs is one where increased collaboration should speed progress in solving some of the more intractable problems in building effective applications},
	keywords = {Books, Collaboration, Collaborative work, Conferences, EC/NSF joint Advanced Research Workshop, Feeds, Human computer interaction, human-centered computing, Internet, Joining materials, Laboratories, Online communities, Research initiatives, USA Councils, User interfaces, Virtual environment, virtual environments, Virtual reality},
	isbn = {0272-1716},
	doi = {10.1109/38.799742},
	author = {Brown,J. R and van Dam,A. and Earnshaw,R. and Encarnacao,J. and Guedj,R. and Preece,J. and Shneiderman, Ben and Vince,J.}
}
@article {16305,
	title = {Assessing software review meetings: results of a comparative analysis of two experimental studies},
	journal = {IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering},
	volume = {23},
	year = {1997},
	month = {1997/03//},
	pages = {129 - 145},
	abstract = {Software review is a fundamental tool for software quality assurance. Nevertheless, there are significant controversies as to the most efficient and effective review method. One of the most important questions currently being debated is the utility of meetings. Although almost all industrial review methods are centered around the inspection meeting, recent findings call their value into question. In prior research the authors separately and independently conducted controlled experimental studies to explore this issue. The paper presents new research to understand the broader implications of these two studies. To do this, they designed and carried out a process of {\textquotedblleft}reconciliation{\textquotedblright} in which they established a common framework for the comparison of the two experimental studies, reanalyzed the experimental data with respect to this common framework, and compared the results. Through this process they found many striking similarities between the results of the two studies, strengthening their individual conclusions. It also revealed interesting differences between the two experiments, suggesting important avenues for future research},
	keywords = {Aggregates, Collaborative work, Computer Society, Costs, Helium, Inspection, inspection meeting, Job shop scheduling, Programming, reconciliation, Software development management, Software quality, software quality assurance, software review meeting assessment, Software reviews},
	isbn = {0098-5589},
	doi = {10.1109/32.585501},
	author = {Porter, Adam and Johnson,P. M}
}
