@conference {12512,
	title = {Recognition of quantized still face images},
	booktitle = {Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, 2009. BTAS {\textquoteright}09. IEEE 3rd International Conference on},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009/09//},
	pages = {1 - 6},
	abstract = {In applications such as document understanding, only binary face images may be available as inputs to a face recognition (FR) algorithm. In this paper, we investigate the effects of the number of grey levels on PCA, multiple exemplar discriminant analysis (MEDA) and the elastic bunch graph matching (EBGM) FR algorithms. The inputs to these FR algorithms are quantized images (binary images or images with small number of grey levels) modified by distance and Box-Cox transforms. The performances of PCA and MEDA algorithms are at 87.66\% for images in FRGC version 1 experiment 1 after they are thresholded and transformed while the EBGM algorithm achieves only 37.5\%. In many document understanding applications, it is also required to verify a degraded low-quality image against a high-quality image, both of which are from the same source. For this problem, the performances of PCA and MEDA are stable when the images were degraded by noise, downsampling or different thresholding parameters.},
	keywords = {(signal);, algorithm;grey, algorithms;face, analysis;quantisation, analysis;quantized, Box-Cox, bunch, component, discriminant, exemplar, Face, FR, graph, images;distance, images;face, levels;multiple, MATCHING, recognition, recognition;principal, transforms;document, transforms;PCA;binary, understanding;elastic},
	doi = {10.1109/BTAS.2009.5339030},
	author = {Tao Wu and Chellapa, Rama}
}
@conference {12693,
	title = {Classification probability analysis of principal component space analysis},
	booktitle = {Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004/08//},
	pages = {240 - 243 Vol.1 - 240 - 243 Vol.1},
	abstract = {In a previous paper, we have presented a new linear classification algorithm, principal component space analysis (PCNSA) which is designed for problems like object recognition where different classes have unequal and non-white noise covariance matrices. PCNSA first obtains a principal components space (PCA space) for the entire data and in this PCA space, it finds for each class "i", an M<sub>i</sub> dimensional subspace along which the class{\textquoteright}s intra-class variance is the smallest. We call this subspace an approximate space (ANS) since the lowest variance is usually "much smaller" than the highest. A query is classified into class "i" if its distance from the class{\textquoteright}s mean in the class{\textquoteright}s ANS is a minimum. In this paper, we discuss the PCNSA algorithm more precisely and derive tight upper bounds on its classification error probability. We use these expressions to compare classification performance of PCNSA with that of subspace linear discriminant analysis (SLDA).},
	keywords = {algorithm;, analysis;, approximate, classification, classification;, component, covariance, discriminant, error, intraclass, linear, matrices;, matrix;, noise;, nonwhite, object, pattern, PCA;, principal, probability;, recognition;, space, space;, statistics;, subspace, variance;},
	doi = {10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334068},
	author = {Vaswani, N. and Chellapa, Rama}
}
@conference {12692,
	title = {Multiple-exemplar discriminant analysis for face recognition},
	booktitle = {Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004/08//},
	pages = {191 - 194 Vol.4 - 191 - 194 Vol.4},
	abstract = {Face recognition is characteristically different from regular pattern recognition and, therefore, requires a different discriminant analysis other than linear discriminant analysis(LDA). LDA is a single-exemplar method in the sense that each class during classification is represented by a single exemplar, i.e., the sample mean of the class. We present a multiple-exemplar discriminant analysis (MEDA) where each class is represented using several exemplars or even the whole available sample set. The proposed approach produces improved classification results when tested on a subset of FERET database where LDA is ineffective.},
	keywords = {analysis;, database;, databases;, discriminant, Face, FERET, multiple-exemplar, recognition;, visual},
	doi = {10.1109/ICPR.2004.1333736},
	author = {Zhou,S. K and Chellapa, Rama}
}
@conference {12763,
	title = {An experimental evaluation of linear and kernel-based methods for face recognition},
	booktitle = {Applications of Computer Vision, 2002. (WACV 2002). Proceedings. Sixth IEEE Workshop on},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002///},
	pages = {13 - 18},
	abstract = {In this paper we present the results of a comparative study of linear and kernel-based methods for face recognition. The methods used for dimensionality reduction are Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Kernel Discriminant Analysis (KDA). The methods used for classification are Nearest Neighbor (NN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). In addition, these classification methods are applied on raw images to gauge the performance of these dimensionality reduction techniques. All experiments have been performed on images from UMIST Face Database.},
	keywords = {analysis;, classification;, component, discriminant, Face, image, Kernel, linear, Machine;, nearest, neighbor;, principal, recognition;, Support, vector},
	doi = {10.1109/ACV.2002.1182137},
	author = {Gupta, H. and Agrawala, Ashok K. and Pruthi, T. and Shekhar, C. and Chellapa, Rama}
}
