@article {18547,
	title = {Architecting for innovation},
	journal = {SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev.},
	volume = {41},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011///},
	pages = {24 - 36},
	abstract = {We argue that the biggest problem with the current Internet architecture is not a particular functional deficiency, but its inability to accommodate innovation. To address this problem we propose a minimal architectural "framework" in which comprehensive architectures can reside. The proposed Framework for Internet Innovation (FII) --- which is derived from the simple observation that network interfaces should be extensible and abstract --- allows for a diversity of architectures to coexist, communicate, and evolve. We demonstrate FII{\textquoteright}s ability to accommodate diversity and evolution with a detailed examination of how information flows through the architecture and with a skeleton implementation of the relevant interfaces.},
	keywords = {diversity, Evolution, innovation, internet architecture},
	isbn = {0146-4833},
	doi = {10.1145/2002250.2002256},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2002250.2002256},
	author = {Koponen,Teemu and Shenker,Scott and Balakrishnan,Hari and Feamster, Nick and Ganichev,Igor and Ghodsi,Ali and Godfrey,P. Brighten and McKeown,Nick and Parulkar,Guru and Raghavan,Barath and Rexford,Jennifer and Arianfar,Somaya and Kuptsov,Dmitriy}
}
