@article {13012,
	title = {Phylogenetic relationships of {\i}t Phytophthora species based on ribosomal ITS I DNA sequence analysis with emphasis on Waterhouse groups V and VI},
	journal = {Mycol Res},
	volume = {104},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000/09//},
	pages = {1055 - 1061},
	abstract = {Phylogenetic relationships among Phytophthora species were investigated by sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region I of the ribosomal DNA repeat unit. The extensive collection of isolates included taxa from all six morphological groups recognized by Waterhouse (1963) including molecular groups previously identified using isozymes and mtDNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Similar to previous studies, the inferred relationships indicated that molecular groups of P. cryptooea/drechsleri-like and P. megasperma-like taxa are polyphyletic. Morphological groups V and VI, which are differentiated by the presence of amphigynous or paragynous antheridia, are not monophyletic: species of the two groups are interspersed in the tree. Species with papillate and semi-papillate sporangia (groups I-IV) clustered together and this cluster was distinct from those of species with non-papillate sporangia. There was no congruence between the mode of antheridial attachment, sporangial caducity, or homo- or heterothallic habit and the molecular grouping of the species. Our study provides evidence that the antheridial position together with homo- or heterothallic habit does not reflect phylogenetic relationships within Phytophthora. Consequently, confirming studies done previously (Cooke \& Duncan 1997), this study provides evidence that the morphological characters used in Phytophthora taxonomy are of limited value for deducing phylogenetic relationships, because they exhibit convergent evolution.},
	author = {F{\"o}rster,H and Cummings, Michael P. and Coffey,M. D}
}
