Euclidean distance matrix completion problems

TitleEuclidean distance matrix completion problems
Publication TypeJournal Articles
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsFang H-ren, O'Leary DP
JournalOptimization Methods and Software
Pagination1 - 23
Date Published2011///
ISBN Number1055-6788
Abstract

A Euclidean distance matrix (EDM) is one in which the (i, j) entry specifies the squared distance between particle i and particle j. Given a partially specified symmetric matrix A with zero diagonal, the Euclidean distance matrix completion problem (EDMCP) is to determine the unspecified entries to make A an EDM. We survey three different approaches to solving the EDMCP. We advocate expressing the EDMCP as a non-convex optimization problem using the particle positions as variables and solving using a modified Newton or quasi-Newton method. To avoid local minima, we develop a randomized initialization technique that involves a nonlinear version of the classical multidimensional scaling, and a dimensionality relaxation scheme with optional weighting. Our experiments show that the method easily solves the artificial problems introduced by Moré and Wu. It also solves the 12 much more difficult protein fragment problems introduced by Hendrickson, and the six larger protein problems introduced by Grooms, Lewis and Trosset.A Euclidean distance matrix (EDM) is one in which the (i, j) entry specifies the squared distance between particle i and particle j. Given a partially specified symmetric matrix A with zero diagonal, the Euclidean distance matrix completion problem (EDMCP) is to determine the unspecified entries to make A an EDM. We survey three different approaches to solving the EDMCP. We advocate expressing the EDMCP as a non-convex optimization problem using the particle positions as variables and solving using a modified Newton or quasi-Newton method. To avoid local minima, we develop a randomized initialization technique that involves a nonlinear version of the classical multidimensional scaling, and a dimensionality relaxation scheme with optional weighting. Our experiments show that the method easily solves the artificial problems introduced by Moré and Wu. It also solves the 12 much more difficult protein fragment problems introduced by Hendrickson, and the six larger protein problems introduced by Grooms, Lewis and Trosset.

URLhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10556788.2011.643888
DOI10.1080/10556788.2011.643888